While I will agree that many of those articles could use significant improvement, I wouldn't take the assessments all that seriously; a lot of those articles have not been assessed in many years, despite intervening improvements.
Risker On 16 June 2014 08:58, Toby Hudson <tob...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've just wikified this in my userspace if anyone wants to quickly check > out our articles on these women. The good news is that we have an article > for each of them. The bad news is that article quality is pretty grim if > these are truly the 100 most powerful women. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:99of9/100powerwomen > > Toby/99of9 > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is a pretty impressive showing for someone just 4 weeks into the >> job: being named to the Forbes list of the 100 most powerful women: >> http://www.forbes.com/profile/lila-tretikov/ >> >> Note that increasing diversity is, according to the brief article, a top >> priority. >> >> Risker/Anne >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
