Hi Risker, Of course you are right, but that is true across the encylopedia, so the relative abundances are probably comparable.
Sorting by "category" is interesting. We're doing particularly poorly for the women in business or technology, not too bad for women in politics, and pretty well for female celebrities. Toby On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Risker <[email protected]> wrote: > While I will agree that many of those articles could use significant > improvement, I wouldn't take the assessments all that seriously; a lot of > those articles have not been assessed in many years, despite intervening > improvements. > > Risker > > > On 16 June 2014 08:58, Toby Hudson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've just wikified this in my userspace if anyone wants to quickly check >> out our articles on these women. The good news is that we have an article >> for each of them. The bad news is that article quality is pretty grim if >> these are truly the 100 most powerful women. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:99of9/100powerwomen >> >> Toby/99of9 >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Risker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This is a pretty impressive showing for someone just 4 weeks into the >>> job: being named to the Forbes list of the 100 most powerful women: >>> http://www.forbes.com/profile/lila-tretikov/ >>> >>> Note that increasing diversity is, according to the brief article, a top >>> priority. >>> >>> Risker/Anne >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gendergap mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
