As A Canadian I would dispute that there's a "North American" culture
that's the same for the US and Canada :)

But yes, I do know women outside of those two countries which are affected
by this.


On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, rupert THURNER <rupert.thur...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> do you know women outside the north american culture, i.e. US and CA,
> affected by this?
>
> rupert
>  Am 03.07.2014 21:13 schrieb "Leigh Honeywell" <le...@hypatia.ca>:
>
> Even if it is an en-wiki only issue, it's having a clear impact on
>> editor retention and therefore the long-term sustainability of the
>> project. I think trying to fix that is easy to dismiss as
>> "micromanagement" but sometimes it turns out that fixing the big
>> picture /does/ require organizational leadership to address specific
>> things.
>>
>> -Leigh
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Well, here's the issue.  It's never been clear to me whether this is a
>> > WMF-wide issue or it's an English Wikipedia specific issue.  The
>> > overwhelming majority of people participating on this list work almost
>> > exclusively on enwiki, and almost every single experience discussed here
>> > involves enwiki.
>> >
>> > As important as we all know English Wikipedia to be (if nothing else,
>> it's
>> > the fundraising driver from which the bulk of donations derives), it's
>> also
>> > only one of hundreds of projects.  There are issues with the Board
>> > micromanaging a single project directly, and pretty serious issues when
>> the
>> > Board tries to fix a problem on one project by creating a global policy
>> or
>> > rule that may actually be counterproductive in other areas.  (And as we
>> can
>> > see from the obtuseness that Commons shows about such issues as
>> personality
>> > rights - a major gendergap issue in my mind - even when the Board does
>> try
>> > to intervene, it's often ineffective.)
>> >
>> > Risker/Anne
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 3 July 2014 14:58, Leigh Honeywell <le...@hypatia.ca> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The more I hear about this, the more I think this is something that
>> >> WMF needs to address at an institutional level (Board etc.) to resolve
>> >> these process issues and loopholes. Has this ever been taken "up the
>> >> chain"?
>> >>
>> >> -Leigh
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You know, I sat on Arbcom for five years, and there were several
>> >> >> occasions
>> >> >> when I practically begged those complaining about the behaviour of
>> >> >> certain
>> >> >> individuals to initiate a case....but nobody wanted to do that...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Well, you know I did actually take one of the worst misogynists on
>> >> > en.wiki
>> >> > to ArbCom,[1] and it was such a horrible experience that I decided to
>> >> > never
>> >> > do it again. After giving up a month of my life to the case and
>> enduring
>> >> > constant harassment during the process, all of the evidence that I
>> >> > painstakingly assembled, presented, and defended was completely
>> ignored
>> >> > by
>> >> > ArbCom, and instead he was banned for a year for making a legal
>> threat.
>> >> > He
>> >> > is now free to return on the condition that he simply agrees not to
>> make
>> >> > any
>> >> > more legal threats. You were actually on that ArbCom panel, Risker,
>> so I
>> >> > don't really understand your argument that taking incivil editors to
>> >> > ArbCom
>> >> > is a good idea. To me it is worse than a waste of effort, it is
>> actually
>> >> > counterproductive and an invitation to be relentlessly harassed.
>> >> >
>> >> > 1.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Alastair_Haines_2&oldid=360884518
>> >> >
>> >> > Ryan Kaldari
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Gendergap mailing list
>> >> > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Leigh Honeywell
>> >> http://hypatia.ca
>> >> @hypatiadotca
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Gendergap mailing list
>> >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Gendergap mailing list
>> > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Leigh Honeywell
>> http://hypatia.ca
>> @hypatiadotca
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>


-- 
Leigh Honeywell
http://hypatia.ca
@hypatiadotca
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to