Great job! The discussions would have to be publicly accessible, to avoid an EEML type situation. Also, any "consensus" made there about external issues would not be applicable, due to the lack of open participation. On Jan 6, 2015 7:35 PM, "Ryan Kaldari" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Cool idea. I added some questions on the talk page. > > Kaldari > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:35 PM, LB <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, I don't know if I did it right, but per Sarah's and Siko's >> suggestion, I started this: >> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/WikiProject_Women >> >> Just bare bones for now. I will work on it some more tomorrow. >> >> Lightbreather >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> [email protected] >> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please >> visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > [email protected] > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
