yes, notice crickets on talk page

you could be dismissive of the questions as the usual "gender gap cabal",
but when andrew lih says that is the perception of the culture among
library professionals, and it needs to change,
you would think good faith arbs would sit up and take notice.

but as DGG says: "I hate to disillusion you, but not only is arb com very
unlikely to eve[n] initiate anything, but it will not even commit itself to
support anything"





On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Kevin Gorman <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've been out of touch with the world for most of the last week, but
> I'm extremely disappointed to see the only active arbitrator to
> comment on that discussion so far just asked for a tl;dr when given a
> two hour long video of free advice from a leading expert in online
> harassment issues.  Almost every case arb takes deals with harassment
> in one form or another - given the time they spend discussing
> trivialities, let alone drafting cases and on private lists, I would
> hope that no arbitrator (none of the sitting ones have formal training
> in dealing with online harrassment, AFAIK, although I may be missing
> someone) would refuse to spend a much smaller amount of time hearing
> one of the top experts n the subject talk about it.  If you can't
> accept a two hour time committment, you probably shouldn't be an arb.
>
> ----
> Kevin Gorman
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Fæ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Links:
> > 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS-Y-FuzAH4&t=85m30s
> > 2.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee#Comments_on_ArbCom_and_gender
> >
> > Folks may be interested in watching the Q&A session at the recent
> > WikiConference USA where gender and harassment was discussed for about
> > 45 minutes.[1] It makes for an interesting summary of how Arbcom is
> > perceived with regard to handling harassment cases, and the types of
> > harassment of significant concern for our community.
> >
> > This has been raised on the Arbcom noticeboard[2], it will be
> > interesting to see how many current Arbcom members make a public
> > comment, or indeed if they are perfectly happy with the way Arbcom
> > currently works, or not.
> >
> > Fae
> > --
> > [email protected] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gendergap mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
> visit:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> [email protected]
> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
> visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to