nice work
this is worth making into do list and adding to women in red tasks

it might be worth scraping nytimes and working back, i.e.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/obituaries/notable-deaths-2014.html

this is a nice task for newbies, like the 1lib1ref for everyone, just
sprinkling nytimes notability dust throughout.

cheers.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Neotarf <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, a bot-driven list would be quite helpful, if for no other reason than
> being standardized and therefore race- and gender-blind as far as selection
> criteria.  I have just finished compiling a list from the NYT article, and
> it was very labor intensive just to generate the list, before even starting
> to look for red links.
>
> Note, obituary notices from international newspapers are "articles", not
> advertisements; for further info see the NYT article on how to tell their
> classified pages from an article.
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/25/business/media/25asktheeditors.html
> Also see the WP article on "obituary".
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obituary
>
> The *articles* referenced in the above "lists of notable deaths in 2015"
> are:
>
> **Los Angeles Times*, "Notable deaths of 2015"
> http://www.latimes.com/local/obituaries/la-me-2015-notable-deaths-gallery-photogallery.html
>
> **The Washington Post*, "Notable deaths of 2015 and 2016"
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/notable-deaths-of-2015/2015/01/06/8a2c7536-92b6-11e4-ba53-a477d66580ed_gallery.html
>
> *The Wall Street Journal, "2015 Year in Review: Notable Deaths"
> http://www.wsj.com/articles/2015-year-in-review-notable-deaths-1450647522
>
> *The Telegraph, "Culture stars who died in 2015"
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/music/news/culture-stars-who-died-in-2015/
>
> **BBC*, "Notable UK deaths of 2015"
> http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35060400
> **New York Times,* "Notable Deaths of 2015"
> http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/obituaries/notable-deaths-2015.html?_r=1
>
> Out of the 200-odd notable deaths in the NYT article, the following women
> are red links:
> * December*: Mariuccia Mandelli, Peggy Say;  *November*; Janet Wolfe;
> *October*: Olga Hirshhorn; *August*:Blondell Cummings, *April*: Evelyn
> Starks Hardy, Anne-Claude Leflaive.
>
> In addition, there are problems noted--several of the articles are stubs,
> one appears to be at the wrong name, one shares an article with her
> husband, and others have tags for reasons that are not immediately
> apparent.  One could wish the people who tag these things would actually
> fix them if they see a problem, or at least leave a note on the talk page.
> I noted several of the articles did not have photos, but did not make a
> note of that.  Is there some checklist?  It would seem if they are now
> deceased it would be possible to find a fair-use image. Complete notes and
> links, as well as links to existing articles are at:
> https://neotarf.wordpress.com/2016/01/25/lists-of-notable-deaths-of-2015/
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:59 PM, J Hayes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> i should not imagine a fear of paid notices, should prevent a systematic
>> inclusion of NYTimes obits, which are assumed notable.
>> especially with the reference generator doing all the formatting.
>>
>> no one is doing this; the article mentions 25% female among these. i.e.
>> we don't include reliable sources even to the extent they present less of a
>> gap than we do.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> >At least in the USA, we have to be cautious about "what is an
>>> obituary." Newspapers also run "death notices" which (both in print and
>>> >online) look much like obituaries, but are actually paid advertisements.
>>> I'm not even certain that the terminology ("obituary"=editorial, >"death
>>> notice"=paid ad) is consistent across news outlets, I'm just reflecting
>>> what I learned from the specific papers I dealt with after >my dad died.
>>>
>>> Writing as someone who once got paid to write newspaper obits, “paids”
>>> are, in print, always in [[agate type]], like sports boxscores; obits look
>>> like any other story in the same newspaper.
>>>
>>> However, textwise, the distinction may be blurring as newspapers cut
>>> back on expenses (such as the newbies and interns who cut their
>>> journalistic teeth writing obits. Just earlier this week, a young coworker
>>> of my wife’s died rather suddenly; when I saw his obit in our local paper I
>>> figured they had just printed the text the funeral home sent along since it
>>> read like a paid, with all sorts of flowery, non-NPOV language that we
>>> never included in obits back in the mid-‘90s regardless of what the funeral
>>> home said in the fax, no mention whatsoever of the cause of death, and
>>> mentions of a rather wide scope of survivors (the main reason for paids, as
>>> families of the decedents usually want to mention relatives outside the
>>> scope of the immediate family that newspapers limit their obits to for
>>> space if nothing else).
>>>
>>> Daniel Case
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
>>> visit:
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
>> visit:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> [email protected]
> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
> visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to