At 09:30 PM 12/29/01 +0100, you wrote: >Micael i am aware of the fact that this is for sure true for you right now. >from my >point of view it looks a little different right now - over the last year i >have developed theoretical research on this topic one aspect in it iso the >concept (by E. Schein 1992) of levels of culture: >artefacts: visible - but need to be interprated >values: half invisible half visible >basic assumptions: which are invisible and unconscious >this questions belong to the basic assumtions - which you are may be not >aware of . . . . . and am for sure not at all dont knowing this culture! >and qualitative researches on the other hand sugest that you should ask that >way - controvers to asking smart questions by Raymond. > >ted thanks for your support :-) > >sari
I had no idea there was a vote saying it was okay to study us in this medium. You certainly followed the rules. What Ted did, I have no idea. And no say. Good luck with your studies. I used to travel near you and present each year in the 80s at the Annual Wittgenstein Symposia in Kircheberg am Wechsel. Are you aware of that? Want to discuss that in here? lol. I guess that would be appropriate. ;-) I wish you had prefaced your question with the fact that someone had given you permission to raise the issue in here. As it was, it was a surprise to me, and perhaps to others. Sort of like having people show up in your office to study you unannounced. (I guess if you bawked at that Ted would think you were closed to open communication too?) I hope you understand that being out of the loop in your own environment is a bit disconcerting. As I said, good luck with your study, and I see you were not the person at fault, if anyone was at fault. micael -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
