-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Craig,
Craig L Russell wrote: > Hi Johan, > > On Apr 22, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Johan Lindquist wrote: > > Hi, > > With the move of Hivemind to the Attic we were now hoping to > continue the development with a fork over at OPS4J. When the > Hivemind PMC voted for the move, it was our understanding that the > intent was to allow for work to continue, if not with Apache, but > also elsewhere. > >> Right. Forks are *not* discouraged. > Great :) > > Now, we were wondering if there is anything in particular we should > or need to think of/consider for this? > >> 1. The Apache license is very liberal, but it does have an >> attribution requirement. So don't overlook the NOTICE. > Notice file would be left intact - there are copyrights as part of the headers in the files - would these remain or can they safely be removed/changed in the derived work? >> 2. Don't call the new project by a name that might confuse >> people. > It will indeed get a new (so far undecided) name - will let the list know when it has been decided. >> Good luck, > Thanks! >> Craig > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Johan > > Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System > http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ8BGLpHYnED7evioRAqf3AJ977Z3CYW86EOqp5562A/UaC41n/wCgnoQf futg1ZbCsmwc+BMLSxdkpC8= =x3vS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
