On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Craig L Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 26, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Johan Lindquist <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Notice file would be left intact - there are copyrights as part of the >>> headers in the files - would these remain or can they safely be >>> removed/changed in the derived work? >> >> They can't be removed, except by the copyright holder. >> >> However - it's not normal Apache practice to keep them in there. There >> was a move to update src headers a few years back and it looks like it >> missed HiveMind. >> >> I'll update the files in hivemind2/trunk [I'm assuming you're taking >> things from trunk and that the desired version is hivemind2]. >> >> Let me know otherwise [I'll aim to do it tomorrow night so you've time >> to point me in the right direction]. >> >> Attic PMC - feel free to -1 if you think this is bad. It's the >> application of a standard Apache style, so I think it's harmless >> enough and will simplify things for the fork. > > I agree with Mads and Henning that the attic is *not* the place for this > kind of cleanup. Copyright notices and licenses should be removed only by > the copyright holders (in conjunction with updating the NOTICE if > appropriate). > > So I'm -1 on changing the copyright notices on attic artifacts.
We are the copyright holder. Anyway - consensus definitely against this so I won't do it. Hen
