On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Bryan Pendleton < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/8/2016 3:05 AM, sebb wrote: > >> The Attic is not intended for individual components of a project. >> >> Such items are for the individual PMCs to manage. >> >> Just make sure the website makes it clear that further development has >> ceased, but ensure that users can still access the historic releases. >> >> > Thank you for the clarifications. > > I was confused, since it seems that in the past, certain sub-projects > have in fact been moved to the attic (e.g., http://attic.apache.org/projec > ts/ojb.html, > which I believe was once part of Apache DB). > > I'll handle the retiring of Apache DDLUtils within the DB PMC, > however, since that is the recommended approach. > > > For the old Umbrellas, retiring a subproject to the Attic has been something we've done; while the more 'modern' projects make sense to deprecate within the existing communities. DDLUtils - I could see be handled either way. Jakarta used to have a retired/dormant section, but that was partly as a precursor of the Attic. When Jakarta retired, we merged it all in. Hen
