On 28 April 2018 at 11:15, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote: > creating a GitBox/GitHub test repository is easy: it's self service [1]
I looked at that, and one can only create empty repos for projects that are registered to use GitBox - see INFRA-16456. > You'll get an empty Git repository that is read/write both from GitBox and > GitHub: you'll be able to do the tests you want. The only little issue is that > future delete of this test repo won't be self service... > > Independently from GitBox/GitHub tests, you can ask INFRA to get a read-only > svn2git mirror, that will prepare the whole Attic site svn history as Git > history, to not loose the history if you decide to finally migrate fully to > Git > > Regards, > > Hervé > > [1] https://gitbox.apache.org/ > > Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 00:09:08 CEST sebb a écrit : >> On 27 April 2018 at 17:57, Jan Iversen <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Sent from my iPad >> > >> >> On 27 Apr 2018, at 17:17, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I think it would be useful to have an Attic GitBox test instance so we >> >> can try out things like Buildbot scripts and online editing. >> >> >> >> It might also be a good way to evaluate the pros and cons of the >> >> various redesigns. >> >> Sort of like a Wiki page. >> > >> > I am not sure what a gitbox test instance consist of, so I tend to be >> > neutral, but considering our site have not changed for a very long time I >> > have to ask is it really needed ? and will someone be responsible for >> > whatever needs to be maintained over time ? >> I thought you wanted to move to Git? >> If so, then it will have to be moved to an ASF GitBox as git-wip is >> being withdrawn. >> >> Having a test instance will allow us to try out Buildbot etc. before >> any possible move. >> >> In any case, the whole point was to have a test instance that can be >> thrown away if we no longer need it. >> >> > In short if you all agree it is a something worth doing, then I will not >> > stand in the way. >> > >> > rgds >> > jan I > >
