Le lundi 30 avril 2018, 21:03:24 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : > Sent from my iPad > > > On 30 Apr 2018, at 20:43, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I don't get what's the issue with creating a test Git repo, that is > > independent from anything else, and that was discussed on the ML > > There are no issue as such, it is just that lately we have seen a lot of > things happening very uncoordinated. In this case it happened crossing > another (slightly older, but with positive comments) to move the production > to git. > > I would have preferred a more organized way, e.g. making sure a test site > (or build bot) will have someone to maintain it, before just doing it. > However this is just my opinion, which, even though I did the maintenance, > seems to count very little. > > Please lets stop this discussion, done is done, and I (as > chair/pmc/committer) will have to accept the consequences. there are no consequences to creating a test git repo
> > rgds > jan I. > > > I did the exact same at GitHub just because it was outside Apache then was > > even more clear that it was a side test to have chance to get common > > tests > > instead of long discussions where it's clear that a part of the discussion > > is that we don't have the same initial culture on the technical parts > > > > regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le lundi 30 avril 2018, 19:39:16 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : > >> Hi > >> > >> We just received an email that attic-test.git is created, on private, > >> which > >> I cannot relay here due to apache policy (which I agree with). > >> > >> I can however relay my response, what apart from a “thank you” was a call > >> to all: > >> > >> “I must however state that the word “consensus” seems to mean nothing in > >> our little community. I remember we have discussed transferring the site > >> to git, something I would have done tomorrow based on the positive > >> comments... but attic-test, where did that come from.” > >> > >> I am concerned about people going in different directions, without trying > >> to get consensus, what the community wants, that way we will never reach > >> a state where we can get a new site online. > >> > >> PMC members know who made the request in self-service but not who > >> initiated > >> it. > >> > >> A concerned committer/PMC/Chair > >> jan I > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPad
