So it may be a few years....

Remember reading only a few years ago that new technology
was being reduced to practice that would produce a factor of
10 increase in areal density on hard drives at roughly the same
manufacturing cost.  There were a few minor snags to be worked
out.  That result has arrived   We still pay bit more than $200 for
a mainstream IDE hard drive.  Back about 1996, that got me a
4.3 GB.  If I watch the paper, I can get a 40 GB drive for even a
few dollars less.

Hope my tape drive holds out until I can afford one of those big
DVD-RW drives and media.

There's still much we can do to avoid grief by a bit of thought
in partitioning and backing up.  Worked a contract one place
that did nightly incremental backups and weekly full backups
with five or six weekly tapes in rotation.  One day they needed
to find a file that had last been used three or four months
back.  It was not anywhere -- nobody had thought to keep an
occasional full backup for permanent archive.  The file needed
was a reference, the 'zero' point values to be subtracted from
current readings to convert to the units in which the data was
reported, i.e. the baseline.  Standard procedure, but something
slipped through the net.

This machine got noisy last week.  Thought it might have a
fan or hard drive getting ready to go.  So I  copied my bookmarks
and address book to a floppy.  Not big files, but not in the data
partition I back up regularly to CD.  I would have been in deep
trouble without them.  Do you know where your address book
and bookmarks are backed up?

Choppy


At 12:51 AM 11/4/01 -0800, you wrote:
>This is from "The Harrow Report" which used to be
>known as "The Rapidly Changing Face of Computing".
>
>http://www.theharrowgroup.com/
>
>John Hebert
>
>------------------------------------
>DVD Backup - Follow-up.


================================================
BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group
Visit http://www.brlug.net for more information.
Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to change
your subscription information.
================================================

Reply via email to