If memory serves me correctly......QT is or was used in KDE. The big arguement back then was to use GNOME since KDE utilized QT and its (then) proprietary license. That is, if memory serves me; it has been known to let me down at times. ;>
Cleve On Saturday 09 March 2002 14:57, you wrote: > Haven't done any GUI programming, but I have use QT in > a few different apps. Most notably Opera needs QT. > Seems to work well and kinda small footprint. > > I think the reason that more Linux types don't use QT > was the proprietary licensing issue in the past that > has since been resolved. > > John Hebert > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > QT looks like an OK framework to build gui apps on > > linux... I'm installing > > it as I type. Has anybody else in this group used > > it and what do you think > > of it? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Craig > > ================================================ > > BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group > > Visit http://www.brlug.net for more information. > > Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to change > > your subscription information. > > ================================================ > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > ================================================ > BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group > Visit http://www.brlug.net for more information. > Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to change > your subscription information. > ================================================ ================================================ BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group Visit http://www.brlug.net for more information. Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to change your subscription information. ================================================
