Bastille does explain to some extent what is going on. Even better, it will 
dump out a log of exactly what it did when everything is finished.

At 10:54 AM 4/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:


>"So we begin with a fresh install of the system with the Linux
>distribution
>of your choice, and in that installation process we'll choose the security
>settings for "High" or whatever the equivalent is if the option is
>available. This should enable package filtering, regulating what is and
>isn't allowed to connect to your system."
>
>This article doesn't do much to explain how to secure your system,
>it just says when you install the system choose the "High" secure
>setting. That must mean everything is secure at this point???
>It doesn't really explain to a person what's going on and how/what they
>can do to help protect themselves. What if someone decides to
>turn off iptables or ipchains because they are not "using" it, as far
>as they know. Then the machine is wide open as far as a firewall
>is concerned.
>
>Also I can make my ports filtered by using my own iptables
>why do I need bastille linux running on top of everything.
>Has anyone ever used Bastille Linux?
>
>The article says Bastille should explain what it's doing along
>the way. I wonder if it shows each iptables command and the
>different options for each?
>
>I'll have to install Bastille somewhere and see what it will do.
>
>Seems like if you are installing Bastille then you wouldn't need
>to install "High" security when installing in the beginning?
>
>Then what happens when a user what's to connect his linux box via
>samba to his windows machine, will he know what to turn off in
>Bastille?
>
>
>Buck, It looks like Bastille is just a package that you can install
>and it will run on top of your current OS. But it will probably
>render the OS useless if you tighten the security as far as it
>will go. For a server that's only running FTP then sure why not
>lock it down, but how many people have a server that's ONLY running
>ftp?
>
>The article does provoke good discussions, but doesn't seem to
>explain much about Linux securty.
>
>--
>Brad Bendily - CNA
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>General mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


---
Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Puryear Information Technology
Windows, UNIX, and IT Consulting
http://www.puryear-it.com




Reply via email to