I'm not sure. The solution here is to just use this on a test system first.

At 04:44 PM 4/11/2003 +0000, you wrote:

>can you uninstall it just as easy and it will reverse the changes?
>It would be cool to try it out, but if it's not what you are looking for, 
>it would be nice to know that it would reverse the changes on an uninstall.
>
>
>
>Adam J. Melancon
>
>
>----Original Message Follows----
>From: Jason DeWitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [brlug-general] A quick way to secure a Linux system
>Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:14:14 -0500
>
>I just ran bastille on my debian box here at work. It's still rebooting so 
>I'm not sure what nmap will say after that. It looks to me like Bastille 
>is simply a perl script that you run as a interface to modifying some hard 
>to find system settings. I don't think it runs as a daemon, or "on top of" 
>your current os.
>
>Brad N Bendily wrote:
>
>>"So we begin with a fresh install of the system with the Linux 
>>distribution of your choice, and in that installation process we'll 
>>choose the security settings for "High" or whatever the equivalent is if 
>>the option is available. This should enable package filtering, regulating 
>>what is and isn't allowed to connect to your system."
>>
>>This article doesn't do much to explain how to secure your system,
>>it just says when you install the system choose the "High" secure
>>setting. That must mean everything is secure at this point???
>>It doesn't really explain to a person what's going on and how/what they
>>can do to help protect themselves. What if someone decides to
>>turn off iptables or ipchains because they are not "using" it, as far
>>as they know. Then the machine is wide open as far as a firewall is 
>>concerned.
>>
>>Also I can make my ports filtered by using my own iptables why do I need 
>>bastille linux running on top of everything.
>>Has anyone ever used Bastille Linux?
>>
>>The article says Bastille should explain what it's doing along
>>the way. I wonder if it shows each iptables command and the different 
>>options for each?
>>
>>I'll have to install Bastille somewhere and see what it will do.
>>
>>Seems like if you are installing Bastille then you wouldn't need
>>to install "High" security when installing in the beginning?
>>
>>Then what happens when a user what's to connect his linux box via
>>samba to his windows machine, will he know what to turn off in
>>Bastille?
>>
>>
>>Buck, It looks like Bastille is just a package that you can install
>>and it will run on top of your current OS. But it will probably render 
>>the OS useless if you tighten the security as far as it
>>will go. For a server that's only running FTP then sure why not
>>lock it down, but how many people have a server that's ONLY running
>>ftp?
>>
>>The article does provoke good discussions, but doesn't seem to explain 
>>much about Linux securty.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>General mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>General mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


---
Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Puryear Information Technology
Windows, UNIX, and IT Consulting
http://www.puryear-it.com




Reply via email to