That is not necessarily true. Only if SCO put in the contested IP would they have given away the lolly pop. As long as they didn't do that they are free to sue away. Whether IBM actually violated their agreement is another matter altogether.
At 07:31 AM 5/16/2003 -0700, you wrote: >http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/2207791 > >SCO, aka Caldera released Linux under the GPL. Aside >from any other issues, that point alone sinks their >battleship. Having released a version of Linux, let >alone being a founding member of a cooperative Linux >movement the code is under the GPL now. A change in >management does not constitute a legal do-over. >Stollen lolly pop? No, just an attempted do-over by >someone hoping to look valuable enough to be bought >out. Shame they went for the sellout instead. Sell >your SCO stock. > >===== >Warmest Regards, > >Doug Riddle >http://www.dougriddle.com >http://fossile-project.sourceforge.net/ >http://www.libranet.com >-- "Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are >the Peoples' Liberty Teeth." - George Washington -- > > >__________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. >http://search.yahoo.com > >_______________________________________________ >General mailing list >[email protected] >http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net --- Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Puryear Information Technology Windows, UNIX, and IT Consulting http://www.puryear-it.com
