On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, will hill wrote: > Well, I'll get a good idea of what's really out there soon enough, if we > have the demo people are talking about. I'm stuck on TLS because I > imagine everyone running a mail server and that being the best and most > secure way to send mail. Why not, it only takes a 486 and the best > software is free? Isn't distributed computing what the Internet is all > about? If everyone did that and mail was echanged via TLS would it ever > have to be decrypted on an intermediate machine?
it's not feasible for everyone to run their own mail server. Mailstores were created because it's expensive to maintain an "always-on" internet connection. it still is. most people still use $20 dial-up cause a $35-$60 broadband connection is too expensive. it'd be like telling everyone to take down their snail mailbox, and just be home when the mailman passes. Bottom line, TLS is not your answer. Give it up. Were you using TLS before Cox blocked port 25? If not, i don't want to hear it... :) Use GPG if you want true end-to-end mail encryption. ray
