Bryce T. Pier wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:59:18PM -0500, John Cole wrote:
>
>
>>Bryce-
>>
>>While it usually pains me to say anything good about Cox, I have been
>>happy with my Geaux Box setup. The only real downside (for me) has been
>>the dynamic IP, but I got around it using No-IP (http://www.no-ip.com/).
>> Note that I did have to configure Apache to listen on a non-80 port.
>>I have had no problems SSH-ing to the box and hitting my webserver.
>>YMMV - there are apparently very few users on my local loop (I must live
>>in a bad, read poor, part of town).
>>
>>
>
>Does the cox modem do NAT? I don't mind having to share the outgoing IP
>address but do want to have at least 3 machines on the network. It's
>interesting that down here several ISPs want to charge more per month
>for multiple machines behind a NAT, how the heck would they even know?
>
>
>
I just would not say anything to Cox. The official policy (as far as I
remember) is that they do not really care, but then again why find out?
You can also pay extra to get extra IPs ($5?), but I think everyone
pretty much just does NAT.
