OK, before any boxes fillup I would like to explicitly state that this was a 
sarcastic remark ;-)

On Tuesday 06 January 2004 03:34 pm, Matt wrote:
> WOW, I wasn't aware there were any M$ enthusiast here.
>
> Alvaro Zuniga wrote:
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >Unfortunately I must agree with the boys who ensambled this study.
> >
> >When you consider that the idea of troubleshooting a windows server is
> >rebooting the machine the training costs are probably more affordable due
> > to the higher demand of professionals in a field ( notice the a instead
> > of a the ). Furthermore, there is the added convenience that when
> > something goes wrong you do not even have to hire anyone; just pull the
> > plug, turn the machine back on, and your business is on the go once
> > again. No need to worry about data loss since that had already happened
> > anyway due to a third party application was misbehaving.
> >
> >On Tuesday 06 January 2004 12:54 pm, Matt wrote:
> >>http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/facts/default.asp
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >General mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

Reply via email to