As was mine.... /end thread. :) Alvaro Zuniga wrote:
>OK, before any boxes fillup I would like to explicitly state that this was a >sarcastic remark ;-) > >On Tuesday 06 January 2004 03:34 pm, Matt wrote: > > >>WOW, I wasn't aware there were any M$ enthusiast here. >> >>Alvaro Zuniga wrote: >> >> >>>Hi everyone, >>> >>>Unfortunately I must agree with the boys who ensambled this study. >>> >>>When you consider that the idea of troubleshooting a windows server is >>>rebooting the machine the training costs are probably more affordable due >>>to the higher demand of professionals in a field ( notice the a instead >>>of a the ). Furthermore, there is the added convenience that when >>>something goes wrong you do not even have to hire anyone; just pull the >>>plug, turn the machine back on, and your business is on the go once >>>again. No need to worry about data loss since that had already happened >>>anyway due to a third party application was misbehaving. >>> >>>On Tuesday 06 January 2004 12:54 pm, Matt wrote: >>> >>> >>>>http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/facts/default.asp >>>> >>>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>General mailing list >>>[email protected] >>>http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net >>> >>> > > >_______________________________________________ >General mailing list >[email protected] >http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GB/CM/CS/IT d+ s+:+ a? C++++ UL++ P+ L+++ E---- W+++ N- o-- K- O- N w--- M++ V PS+++ PE++ Y t+++ 5 X R+ tv-- b++ DI+ D G+ e h! r z+++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
