http://www.caida.org/tools/measurement/cflowd/
More than I'll ever need to know about cflowd.  Good
luck, and happy hunting.

Doug

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ......damn
> I did a apt-get install flowscan
> ...and the suggested and recommended stuff
> and it works
> well....I am able to use the flow-capture utility
> from the flow-tools package that gets automatically
> installed with flowscan.
> The funny thing is that every single reference,
> installation manual, etc that I can find on google
> that pertains to flowscan and flow-tools states that
> cflowd is used to collect the NetFlow
> data....however I am collecting data and it is
> wonderful data too but for the life of me I can't
> find a cflowd* anywhere except as a gzipped example
> file of how its supposed to be configured.
> I am making an assumption that cflowd is no longer
> developed and that the code or similar code has been
> infused into the flow-tools package.  The thing that
> sucks is that I can't find any reference to this
> being the case.
> I basically have a system that is collecting data
> and the software claims to need the cflowd but it
> ain't there.
> That being said I am on cloud nine because I am
> actually collecting NetFlow v5 data and its
> beautful.
> Just thought I would update those of you who
> responded to my rants.
> Thanks,
> cleve
> > 
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2004/03/04 Thu PM 01:47:28 EST
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Re: [brlug-general] question about
> installing stuff
> > 
> > I'll give it a shot....thanks for the heads up!
> > cha
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > From: Doug Riddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: 2004/03/04 Thu AM 11:57:21 EST
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: Re: [brlug-general] question about
> installing stuff
> > > 
> > > No, you don't need the source.  You probably
> have
> > > Alien installed already.  At a shell prompt,
> type
> > > Alien --help.  It will tell you all you need to
> know,
> > > it a few short sentences.
> > > 
> > > Doug
> > > 
> > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Actually, I'm not resistant to anything that
> will
> > > > work.
> > > > I do know that flow-tools requires a patched
> version
> > > > of cflowd and I also have never used Alien
> thus I've
> > > > never created a .deb file myself......ie. I
> assume
> > > > that I need the source for everything
> involved,
> > > > arts++, cflowd, flow-tools, flowscan etc. 
> Does
> > > > anyone know of a site that already has the deb
> file
> > > > created?  I'm honestly up for any idea on what
> would
> > > > work.  I did a fresh knoppix install this
> morning
> > > > and started going slower and found that the
> arts++
> > > > isn't even "make"ing correctly.  Thus my
> probably
> > > > are occuring at the very first step.....my
> order of
> > > > operation has been to install in this order:
> arts++,
> > > > patch cflowd then install cflowd, already have
> perl
> > > > 5, Korn shell, rrdtool, perl modules -
> Boulder,
> > > > ConfigReader:DirectiveStyle(this module seems
> to be
> > > > broke on cpan and you have to move certain
> files to
> > > > another directory manually), HTML::TABLE,
> > > > Net::Patricia, Cflow (perl module as well) and
> > > > lastly FlowScan.....ummm, flow-tools is in
> there
> > > > somewhere too.
> > > > 
> > > > Actually, I just did an apt-get install
> flow-tools
> > > > and apt-get install flowscan......I'll let you
> know
> > > > if it works.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > cleve
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Date: 2004/03/04 Thu AM 08:02:08 EST
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: Re: [brlug-general] question about
> > > > installing stuff
> > > > > 
> > > > > Cleve Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Last night I wiped everything clean and
> started
> > > > fresh..........first
> > > > > > thing I noticed was that arts++ didn't
> make
> > > > correctly.....Knoppix has
> > > > > > GNU Make 3.8.0 and I think there is an
> issue
> > > > with the arts++ software
> > > > > > not having flex headers or .hh or
> > > > somethingorother.....if that makes
> > > > > > any sense. Today I am going to try an
> older
> > > > version of arts++.....and
> > > > > > there is also a reference by the author of
> > > > flowscan that he had to
> > > > > > edit some file to include a directory
> where his
> > > > flex headers were
> > > > > > actually located????
> > > > > > Does this sound like a lesson in futility?
> I'm
> > > > definitely over my head
> > > > > > with this but I have to admit that I am
> slowly,
> > > > painfully learning a
> > > > > > lot.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I've installed flowscan, with arts++ and
> cflowd on
> > > > Solaris -- which meant
> > > > > compiling from source.  It's not futile but
> it may
> > > > be a wrestling
> > > > > match.  flowscan's mailing list was pretty
> good.  
> > > > > 
> > > > > You're probably going to have to supply more
> > > > specifics to get help 
> > > > > on the list -- ie, cuttin' and pastin
> relevant
> > > > output and errors.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Why are you resisting installing the
> flowscan
> > > > .deb?  It would include
> > > > > cflowd and arts++ dependencies.  You'd need
> to
> > > > configure them to receive
> > > > > your netflow data but the building would be
> > > > already done.
> > > > > 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > Scott Harney<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > "...and one script to rule them all."
> > > > > gpg key fingerprint=7125 0BD3 8EC4 08D7 321D
> CEE9
> > > > F024 7DA6 0BC7 94E5
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > > General mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > >
> http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > General mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> > > 
> > > 
> > > =====
> > > Warmest Regards,
> > > 
> > > Doug Riddle
> 
=== message truncated ===


=====
Warmest Regards,

Doug Riddle
Infinity.  It would seem to imply that there must be an equal number of even 
and odd numbers.  If you can add one to any number, and create another number, 
then there has to be an equal number of each, in every direction.  However, 
there is one, and only one even prime number.  The number 2, the third number 
in the Fibonacci series, which is an odd number.  Aha - conspiracy!  If the 
only Even Prime is even, then there are more even numbers than odd!  They tried 
to cover it by making it the third Fibonacci number!

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com

Reply via email to