That's a cheap flame, Bryce. I know that the default configuration on any Linux is more secure than Winblows. I also know that any Linux install will take less time to keep up and cause fewer heartaches than Winblows. I saw Winblows in a place that had all the money in the world to throw at protecting business IT and it failed miserably in a way that free software could not. That does not make me blind or ignorant.
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 09:49 am, Bryce T. Pier wrote: > I could go on for pages and hours about secuirty practices but I'll assume > most list members have done their research and aren't blindly assuming they > are secure just because they aren't running windows.
