It is important for those looking at this to know that this is for LM (Lan Manager) passwords (Windows 98, NT 4.0). This is NOT for NTLMv2 passwords used in Windows 2000 and up domains.
Andrew Baudouin Applications Programmer AWC, Incorporated [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/general_brlug.net/attachments/20041108/fa126147/attachment.htm From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 8 16:00:40 2004 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Maurice Theriot) Date: Mon Nov 8 16:00:27 2004 Subject: [brlug-general] SECURITY: On-line database of all char based pass word hashes for Windows NT Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK, I don't know if this is what the topic is about, but if you are looking to crack the SAM file of XP's password hashes don't bother. Password cracking made easy with http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/ (NT Password Cracker-- Linux Bootdisk) --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/general_brlug.net/attachments/20041108/be4f490b/attachment.htm From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 8 16:04:08 2004 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Maurice Theriot) Date: Mon Nov 8 16:03:54 2004 Subject: [brlug-general] Why Don't My Posts Here Wordwrap. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I am so tired of my posts going on off of the screen on this mailing list, everyone else's wraps to the next line. Please tell me how to fix this. I am using yahoo as my email. Shouldn't have to do with browser's because it happens in firefox and internet explorer. (this is probably the only non-linux question i'd post here) --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/general_brlug.net/attachments/20041108/514dbdda/attachment.htm From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 8 16:28:37 2004 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (-ray) Date: Mon Nov 8 16:28:20 2004 Subject: [brlug-general] SECURITY: On-line database of all char based pass word hashes for Windows NT In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> True, but in Win2k LM passwords are turned on by default for backwards compatibility with 98/NT4 clients. You have to explicitly turn off LM passwords if you know there are no 98/NT4 clients. Since i think it's a registry tweak to turn off LM, i'd imagine a lot of servers still have it turned on. At least on the Win2k box i looked at, i had an LM hash as well as an NTLMv2 hash. Of course i could be totally wrong. I don't claim to know anything about Windows. ray =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ray DeJean http://www.r-a-y.org Systems Engineer Southeastern Louisiana University IBM Certified Specialist AIX Administration, AIX Support =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Baudouin, Andrew wrote: > It is important for those looking at this to know that this is for LM (Lan > Manager) passwords (Windows 98, NT 4.0). This is NOT for NTLMv2 passwords > used in Windows 2000 and up domains. > > > Andrew Baudouin > > Applications Programmer > > AWC, Incorporated > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
