Ah. You should get that thinkgeek shirt "I read your email." ;)
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Fournet Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 2:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [brlug-general] Trying Thunderbird again.. Our organization has to retain all our email, so I have Exchange sending a copy of every received email to a linux box that stores the mail in Maildirs. 60 gigs is about a year's worth. On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 13:45 -0600, Christian Tortorich wrote: > What I'm curious about here is how do you have 60 GIGS of email? I have > 1GB and I have been collecting all email since 99 (I do delete > attachments I will never use again as well as useless crap, spam, etc). > > I run my own mail server here at LSU with exchange 2003 using RPC/HTTP > (ducks). Works really well for me. Was considering Gmail for awhile but > why let someone else house my data when I can do it myself. > > Anyway, just curious. > > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Tim Fournet > Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 10:33 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Trying Thunderbird again.. > > The only client that I've found really handles IMAP well is Evolution. > I've got an IMAP account with about 60 gigs worth of email in it, and > Evolution is the only client that can actually parse through it with any > > real usability. For Windows, Thunderbird works much better for me than > IE, though. At least until Evolution gets ported: > http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/17/190204&tid=223&tid=131 > &tid=106 > > > Dustin Puryear wrote: > > > Dustin Puryear wrote: > > Well, I have been making a point of doing a lot of email this weekend > > so I can test Thunderbird before the business week starts. So far I > > like the latest Thunderbird. It's a bit faster and I've only found one > > > bug so far. > > > > Alas, Thunderbird is still slower than OE when dealing with IMAP and > > offline support. The speed difference is noticeable but I can live > > with it. > > > > So it looks like Thunderbird 1.0 is a keeper at this point. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > General mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
