What I'm curious about here is how do you have 60 GIGS of email? I have 1GB and I have been collecting all email since 99 (I do delete attachments I will never use again as well as useless crap, spam, etc).
I run my own mail server here at LSU with exchange 2003 using RPC/HTTP (ducks). Works really well for me. Was considering Gmail for awhile but why let someone else house my data when I can do it myself. Anyway, just curious. Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Fournet Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 10:33 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Trying Thunderbird again.. The only client that I've found really handles IMAP well is Evolution. I've got an IMAP account with about 60 gigs worth of email in it, and Evolution is the only client that can actually parse through it with any real usability. For Windows, Thunderbird works much better for me than IE, though. At least until Evolution gets ported: http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/17/190204&tid=223&tid=131 &tid=106 Dustin Puryear wrote: > Dustin Puryear wrote: > Well, I have been making a point of doing a lot of email this weekend > so I can test Thunderbird before the business week starts. So far I > like the latest Thunderbird. It's a bit faster and I've only found one > bug so far. > > Alas, Thunderbird is still slower than OE when dealing with IMAP and > offline support. The speed difference is noticeable but I can live > with it. > > So it looks like Thunderbird 1.0 is a keeper at this point. > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
