John Hebert wrote: > http://www.eatel.com/portfiltering > > Doesn't seem to be as onerous as Cox's. Seems to be a > logical step to fight viruses caused by lusers running > without a firewall. I can live with this. > > Opinions?
Hmm. I went to support.cox.net search for "port block" and found a page called "Information: Ports blocked or restricted by Cox High Speed Internet" . Interestingly enough, the list of blocked ports is _exactly_ the same as Eatel's (I'd have provided a direct link but it's not easy to do they way cox's support site is designed) -- Scott Harney<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Asking the wrong questions is the leading cause of wrong answers" gpg key fingerprint=7125 0BD3 8EC4 08D7 321D CEE9 F024 7DA6 0BC7 94E5
