On Mon, 16 May 2005, John Hebert wrote: > Doesn't seem to be as onerous as Cox's. Seems to be a > logical step to fight viruses caused by lusers running > without a firewall. I can live with this. > > Opinions?
Doesn't bother me, as long as they provide a reliable and fast mail relay. Inbound port 80 block is unfortunate, but such is life. 443 is probably open still. The rest of those ports have no business on the Internet, IMO. Does anyone know when these filters went into place? I'm still getting connects from dynamic.eatel.net IP's, which is assume are dynamic DSL/Dialup, and are probably spam from the sober.q virus. Anyone speak German? :) ray
