There ya go... http://www.eff.org/wp/detecting-packet-injection
Who wants to test? Karthik On 1/16/08, Mathew Branyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to say that the eff released a tool or procedure that will let you > know if your isp is shaping your traffic > > -----Original Message----- > From: Petri Laihonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 8:06 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Cox and P2P > > I've been downloading said torrent file since yesterday..... Currently > I'm getting the highest speeds for it ~ 90 to 160Kb/s > Average has been since yesterday 38.0KB/s. Peers with 100% availability > has increased from 4 to 15 since yesterday. > > Family guy Blue harvest downloaded at the same time with average of > 312KB/s.... > > To me everything look normal here in New Orleans.... > > Petri > > Tim Fournet wrote: > > I regularly hit 700+ kilobytes per second downloads on bittorrents on my > > Cox connection at home. I think the problem in your case is whatever > > file you're trying to download just isn't that popular. Remember, the > > more people in the torrent, the better it works. If there are only two > > other people seeding the file, and they each have a 20 kilobit upload > > max setting, then you wont get more than 20k. Judging your link quality > > by bittorrent isn't a very bright idea, regardless if you suspect your > > provider of sabotaging the connections. > > > > Also, what kind of router are you using? Poor quality routers will choke > > and die on the sheer number of TCP connections that occur on bittorrents. > > > > Thirdly, if you're going to accuse someone of sending RST packets to > > your network, do you have packet captures to back that up? > > > > I don't agree with ANY ISP blocking or altering traffic fraudulently. > > But it's equally important to get real facts before making accusations. > > > > > > willhill wrote: > > > >> This is not about technical limitations, it's about sabotage. Cox has > >> given > >> me a symmetry of shit. My download is 40, my upload is 55KB/s. There's > >> no M > >> in those numbers and I might as well have DSL. All the RST packets, I'm > >> sure, are flooding my leg of the network but it will take me another 17 > >> hours > >> to get the rest of the file. Oh well. > >> > >> On Tuesday 15 January 2008 2:29 pm, Scott Harney wrote: > >> > >> > >>> To some degree this isn't even a cost issue but a technical one. You are > >>> tied to certain physical limitations inherent in the medium. Until there > >>> are some changes in how DOCSIS works and some spectrum is made available > >>> on > >>> the upstream side, you'll never say faster upstream on a cable modem > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> General mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > >> > >> > > > > > > > [The entire original message is not included] > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
