willhill wrote: > I will be unable to prove interference without co-operation. The technique > requires monitoring of traffic at two points to observe RST packets received > that neither party transmits. Observation of these packets by other Cox > users as published in Broadband reports is sufficient proof for me that Cox > is interfering with bittorrent. I'm willing to try this out myself but don't > expect a fair result because Cox monitors this list. It would work out > better if other Cox users on this list tried the same thing and noted their > download speed. > Who from Cox monitors this list? > Shannon, your speed is good evidence of an unpopular torrent, but five to ten > users should still be able to saturate my pipes. How long did you download? > Well it's also possible that some of the peers you're pulling from are throttling their own upload within their bt clients. Or, they themselves are the victims of throttling by their ISPs.
For your test, ideally you'd want someone from Baton Rouge Cox, New Orleans Cox, and someone with some other ISP to compare results. _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
