I don't think so. That sounds.. expensive. From what I know, and that's
not much, it would be more an issue of resource allocation.

Once you leave the cell tower I think you are all digital (at least I
assume so since frequency is expensive and analog would be a waste),
just like how POTS is all digital once you hit the big telco switches.
However, to allocate a voice channel the cell system probably has to set
aside a set amount of resources, and those resources are probably much
higher than for txt, even if txt has a lower priority.

That's what I think at least.. :)

--
Dustin Puryear
President and Sr. Consultant
Puryear Information Technology, LLC
225-706-8414 x112
http://www.puryear-it.com

Author, "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers"
  http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices/


Karthik Poobal wrote:
> Don't they use different frequencies for data and voice?
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Karthik Poobalasubramanian
> Louisiana Board of Regents
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 225-910-6126
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 29, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Petri Laihonen wrote:
> 
>> Cell towers crap out first with Voice, not with data.... I guess  
>> data is easier to queue....  :-)
>> Text messaging worked a lot longer than Voice.... And that's when  
>> majority learned that useful function in mobile world.
>>
>> I remember the first Mardi Gras after the cell phone boom arrived to  
>> US. I had no problems communicating at the same time people were  
>> complainin that their calls can not go through......   (I also  
>> expected that to happen......)
>>
>> In most cases it is the incompetence of the people in the stores  
>> provisioning the phones/plans rather than technology which fails.  I  
>> have been a victim of that about 80% of the time.....  Latest case  
>> being my iPhuck activation.....   After they screwed up my wireless  
>> account yet again, it took me 6 hours on the phone over 3 separate  
>> days before it was activate. They could have done it the way I told  
>> them to do it, but no.....
>>
>>
>> Petri
>>
>>
>> -ray wrote:
>>>
>>> Several times this week, people have said "we should have some of  
>>> those cell cards for our laptops in case we lose internet!".   I  
>>> reminded them that the cell towers were the first thing to crap out  
>>> during Katrina.
>>>
>>> Hopefully AT&T learned some things, and the infrastructure is  
>>> better now than it was 3 years ago.
>>>
>>> ray
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Petri Laihonen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Even via mobile if it comes down to that.....�� I have multiple  
>>>> phones with multiple operators, so I'm not completely in the dark
>>>> with my iPhuck.....� :-)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> General mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> General mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> 
> --
> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
> Click here to report this message as spam. 
> http://esva.puryear-it.com/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

Reply via email to