Agreed!

--
Dustin Puryear
President and Sr. Consultant
Puryear Information Technology, LLC
225-706-8414 x112
http://www.puryear-it.com

Author, "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers"
  http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices/


-ray wrote:
> 
> I'm no expert either, but I tend to agree.  A voice call is MUCH more
> bandwidth and resource intensive than a txt message.  You probably use
> more bandwidth in the first second of a voice call than when sending a
> txt.  With lots of towers down, the remaining towers were inundated with
> voice calls and couldn't handle the load.  It was a lot easier to sneak
> through a low bandwidth txt message than setup and maintain a
> full-fledged voice channel.
> 
> That is just pure conjecture on my part though.  I could be totally
> wrong. :)
> 
> ray
> 
> 
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Petri Laihonen wrote:
> 
>> I do not know the tower operations in detail, but my gut feeling says no.
>> It is more like voice and data channels. For instance you get certain
>> amount of 64kb voice channels out of one T1 line. Those are
>> the ones getting congested. There could be similar amount of channels
>> for data, but data can be buffered/queued and normally
>> require less bandwidth, whereas voice can not (or very very little)
>> and uses relatively more bandwidth.
>>
>> Again, I'm not an expert in GPRS or other wireless protocols in
>> detail....� so my gut feeling may be off a bit. Also, this
>> scenario keeps shifting towards heavier data usage and some day all
>> voice channels are just pure data. (I think they already are,
>> but will be a bit different format.....)
>>
>> Petri
>>
>>
>> Karthik Poobal wrote:
>>
>>  Don't they use different frequencies for data and voice?
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Karthik Poobalasubramanian
>> Louisiana Board of Regents
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 225-910-6126
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 29, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Petri Laihonen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>  Cell towers crap out first with Voice, not with data.... I guess data
>> is easier to queue....  :-)
>> Text messaging worked a lot longer than Voice.... And that's when
>> majority learned that useful function in mobile world.
>>
>> I remember the first Mardi Gras after the cell phone boom arrived to
>> US. I had no problems communicating at the same time people were
>> complainin that their calls can not go through......   (I also
>> expected that to happen......)
>>
>> In most cases it is the incompetence of the people in the stores
>> provisioning the phones/plans rather than technology which fails.  I
>> have been a victim of that about 80% of the time.....  Latest case
>> being my iPhuck activation.....   After they screwed up my wireless
>> account yet again, it took me 6 hours on the phone over 3 separate
>> days before it was activate. They could have done it the way I told
>> them to do it, but no.....
>>
>>
>> Petri
>>
>>
>> -ray wrote:
>>
>>
>>  Several times this week, people have said "we should have some of
>> those cell cards for our laptops in case we lose internet!".   I
>> reminded them that the cell towers were the first thing to crap out
>> during Katrina.
>>
>> Hopefully AT&T learned some things, and the infrastructure is better
>> now than it was 3 years ago.
>>
>> ray
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Petri Laihonen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>  Even via mobile if it comes down to that.....���� I have multiple
>> phones with multiple operators, so I'm not completely in the dark
>> with my iPhuck.....�� :-)
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> General mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> General mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> General mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

Reply via email to