Ah, IPSEC tunnels. I used to play with some Linux and BSD based
firewalls, but ended up sticking with Cisco ASA's for when we need a VPN
(like between Puryear and our colo).

Regardless of what you pick, it's nice to be able to forget you even
have a VPN up.

---
Puryear IT, LLC - Baton Rouge, LA - http://www.puryear-it.com/
Active Directory Integration : Web & Enterprise Single Sign-On
Identity and Access Management : Linux/UNIX technologies

Download our free ebook "Best Practices for Linux and UNIX Servers"
http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices/

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of worms
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 4:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [brlug-general] PfSense

I'm running PfSense 1.2.2 at work and at home.  I have several IPSec 
tunnels setup between pfsense boxes and SonicWall NSA and TZ series 
devices.  The IPSEC tunnels have been flawless.

Edmund Cramp wrote:
> I'm running 1.2.3-RELEASE which has been stable with no problems or
unexpected behaviors since it came out in December.  I have it installed
at work on an old 400MHz Celeron - WAN, LAN and DMZ plus the Squid
package at work.  We're only on a 1.5Mbps cable connection with a mail,
ftp and web server DMZ, plus a few users on the LAN so it's not very
busy - the PfSense graphs suggest the CPU is about 4-5% busy during the
day.
>
> I have another copy running on an ALIX board with Wifi support at home
via PPPoE/DSL - I'd played with several different firewalls early last
year and PfSense has definitely been the easiest to work with so far.
There's a book about it too so the documentation is better than average.
>
> We don't use IPSEC or VPNs but their forum is pretty active and what
I've seen suggests that your performance levels ought to be no problem
with more modern hardware.
>
> Regards,
> Edmund Cramp - [email protected]
> Motion Lab Systems, Inc. - http://www.motion-labs.com
> 15045 Old Hammond Highway, Baton Rouge, LA 70816  USA
> Tel: 1.225.272.7364 (Central Time Zone, GMT-6)
> Fax: 1.225.272.7336
>  
>  
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: [email protected] 
> | [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Stokes
> | Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 11:57 AM
> | To: [email protected]
> | Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Ping - Search for intelligent life
> | 
> | I've used PfSense for years in several locations.  I haven't 
> | loaded up the newest version 2 yet but a friend has.
> | 
> | Any idea of your performance level?  Capable of keeping up 
> | with 1 GB throughput, or even close?  Any idea about 
> | throughput on IPSEC VPNs?
> | 
> | On Jan 4, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Edmund Cramp wrote:
> | 
> | > It's been quiet here recently - much quieter since Dustin played 
> | > whack-a-mole with some discussion a while back ... Maybe we're all

> | > busy trying to make a living in the current economic climate?
> | >
> | > Update - I've been plying with the latest PfSense firewall 
> | build (OK 
> | > so it's more BSDish than Linuxish) and it's quite a nice 
> | snappy little 
> | > firewall that makes building rules almost fun ... Can that 
> | be so bad? 
> | > http://www.pfsense.org
> | >
> | > Regards
> | > Edmund Cramp
> | > --
> | > There are only two industries that refer to their customers as 
> | > 'users'.
> | >  - Edward Tufte
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
>   

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

Reply via email to