On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Ray <[email protected]> wrote: > Any of you following the current CentOS controversy? Management > issues, lack of communication, lack of manpower, timeliness of > releases and security updates. Ie, after RHEL 5.6 was released, it > took 3 months to get CentOS 5.6 released. And a full 6 months after > RHEL 6 was released, there is still no CentOS 6. > > A lot of the community is migrating to Scientific Linux. Just > wondering if any of you have, or are considering making the switch. > > ray > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net >
I haven't been following the controversy, but I've moved away from CentOS in the last year because I got tired of dealing with stale packages. While I understand that RHEL/CentOS drive toward stability and not being on the bleeding edge, being several minor releases back on packages like PostgreSQL and Ruby was really keeping some of the functionality/improvements I wanted/needed from being utilized. Ronnie
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
