"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Screw the merits.. Its a big pain in the a** to me. Everything else is > crap. ;-)
Well, we should certainly make sure we don't inconvenience you. > I have to right click and select "reply to list" which requires me to > realize that this is the ONLY apache list I'm on that has made such a > lame derivation from the rest.. . In your opinion. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the first list I have *ever* been on that munges the reply-to. I've had to get used to it even though I don't particularly care for. > Not only that but its wonderful how everyone replies to all and I get 30 > freaking copies by the end of the day. And even lovelier how a > wonderful list of email addresses is compiled for spammer convenience. > Sure they can get it anyhow, but you don't have to serve it up with a > glass of Rotlan Torra for them! > Having a debate on this is STUPID. There are no merits less two: I *totally* agree that this is stupid. I thought that we took a vote on this two weeks ago and the matter was closed, but I guess the vote will be left open until we munge the sodding reply-to. > 1. What do most of the other lists use? > 2. What is one's personal preference? (majority rules) This is the worst example of bikeshed painting I've seen in a long time. To hell with deciding what commons is actually for, let's debate mailing list prefs. Maybe next we can debate whether emacs is better than vi, Linux is better than BSD, etc. -Fitz
