Having a debate on this is STUPID. There are no merits less two:
I understand the issues of reply-to munging vs. not munging the reply-tos, which is why I didn't bother replying to Justin's post -- I didn't want to start a debate. I just wanted my voice heard.
But, again, the point of my original email (which seemed to spur the creation of this thread) was not to start a debate about it. My main point was to suggest another alternative name for "commons" ("share" or "shared") and to ask whether there was a list that was receiving the commit messages for the commons repository.
I find it kind of amusing that my id got added in the STATUS file to those in favor of reply-to munging, yet my alternative suggestion for a name that doesn't conflict with jakarta-commons was ignored and not added to the file.
Must have something to do with starting my email with a touchy topid. Very few probably read past the first paragraph. C'est la vie.
regards, michael
