On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:56, Greg Stein wrote: > As a Granter of Karma (ba-boom...), I don't mind this. I really don't think > the addition of committers is all that frequent. *Maybe* one a week? (after > the initial onslaught) If it gets problematic, then we have two approaches: > > 1) use tools to ease karma management > 2) remove karma commit restrictions and move to "adult" mode > > I'd take option (1). A while ago (geez, maybe just a day or two? :-), I > thought that using the "we're all adults" mode would be workable. But then > I realized that it actually isn't. A non-committer might commit "just that > teeny little patch; what's the problem?" Do that a couple more times. But > then, some day, commit one that is just on the boundary of Right. At that > point, it then becomes real ugly. "but I've committed little patches > before" "but that one wasn't Right" "huh? it is a little change!" etc etc > > As a result, I think that a more drawn out line might be important.
+1 -- Cheers, Peter Donald ------------------------------------------------------ Mark Twain: "In the real world, the right thing never happens in the right place at the right time. It is the task of journalists and historians to rectify this error." ------------------------------------------------------
