On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> On 11/3/02 10:41 PM, "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On Sunday, November 3, 2002 7:33 PM -0500 Henri Yandell > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Exactly [regex bit]. Commons and Jakarta-Taglibs both work well when > >> people obey this convention [with [general] as an 'everyone' one], > >> but enforcing it would stop the frequent times when a new user to > >> the Dev list has to be given the speech. > >> > >> Also stops us forgetting too :) > > > > -1 on mandatory enforcement of this. > > > > If people want to have this as a convention fine, but this should not > > be required. > > > > Personally, I don't think adding such fields to the subject line is a > > good idea. IMHO, a far better thing is to just have meaningful > > subject lines in the first place. -- justin I'm fine with the sentiment, but mail filters don't deal with meaningful subject lines. > -1 on mandatory enforcement, but +1 on encouragement. > > You'll find that with the slosh of messages for unrelated projects on the > commons list, having a hint of what to read or dump is very helpful. Still, it will lead to an increase of the number of times [d] has to be hit. Would be nice to have a mail-agent in which I can hit 'D' or something and it will kill anything in that thread. Hen
