On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 11:15, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > I think moving it to db-commons would be a good idea. The tricky part > there may be getting a quorum of developers to bootstrap the initiative. > Past proposals on db-commons have died from a complete lack of activity, > but that trend is probably reversable.
I use it and I believe Strachan does as well. I play with my own copy as I tend to avoid the commons morass but I would certainly be happier to see the code move to db.apache.org. > On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, __matthewHawthorne wrote: > > > Thomas Mahler wrote: > > > Sounds reasonable for me! > > > But I don't know if we need any special procedure for such a move. > > > I also don't know if it make sense to continue it as a sepearte project > > > or if it should be incorporated into the torque project for instance? > > > > > > any thought how to proceed? > > > > Well, since the code was originally in Torque, but then separated into > > another project, I don't think it makes sense to put it back into > > Torque. It was moved into Jakarta Commons because it contains some > > generally useful functionality. But, I think it would be a better fit > > in the DB Commons. > > > > When I asked about a special procedure, I meant where to import the code > > in CVS, and also any formal proposals or anything that I need to create. > > > > > > -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society
