Out of interest, what part of the mess do you find to be a mess? Question to Jason as well.
Hen On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Brian McCallister wrote: > I will be happy to help get db-commons rolling, particularly as OJB is > looking at some major refactoring/reworking for 1.1 and it will be good > to pull out reusable components as we can. > > Additionally, I have a sandbox style project I have resisted adding to > jakarta-commons-sandbox as... well... that is a mess =) I may propose it > to db-commons once it is off the ground in order to help start building > up the libraries =) > > I want to see db-commons take off, and am willing to commit time to > helping make that happen. > > -Brian > > On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 11:51, __matthewHawthorne wrote: > > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > I think moving it to db-commons would be a good idea. The tricky part > > > there may be getting a quorum of developers to bootstrap the initiative. > > > Past proposals on db-commons have died from a complete lack of activity, > > > but that trend is probably reversable. > > > > Before I started working on the project, I attempted to contact the > > original authors to make sure it was ok. I didn't get much of a > > response, Daniel Rall was the only one who gave me the green light. So, > > if a move to db commons requires an active developer community, then it > > may be a problem. > > > > However, I think that [sql] is a very good project and deserves better > > than to rot away in the Jakarta Commons Sandbox. Hmm -- what would be > > the best solution to this problem? Who else do I need to contact? > > > > > > > >
