Hi Jacob,

It might be more tricky to parse from Access side, but it is not difficult to 
compress the returned data with a custom xquery from MarkLogic Server side. 
That could significantly decrease the total number of bytes sent across (and 
could also serve as some security as well)..

Kind regards,
Geert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Jakob Fix
> Sent: dinsdag 27 april 2010 16:11
> To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
> Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] MarkLogic and MS 
> Accessdatabasecommunication
> 
> Thanks Geert,
> 
> that sounds like a feasible solution. We just might to have 
> to run some tests to see whether this is appropriate for the 
> transfer of large amounts of data.
> 
> cheers,
> Jakob.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 15:37, Geert Josten 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Jacob,
> >
> > It might be more straight forward to just access MarkLogic 
> through HTTP. If I'm not mistaken it shouldn't be difficult 
> to plug an HTTP Client into your Access code. You might also 
> be able to use MSXML library to parse XML output to extract 
> what you need. If not, you could have MarkLogic return data 
> as comma-separated (with a custom xquery) and do some string 
> parsing from Access side..
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Geert
> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > drs. G.P.H. (Geert) Josten
> > Consultant
> >
> >
> > Daidalos BV
> > Hoekeindsehof 1-4
> > 2665 JZ Bleiswijk
> >
> > T +31 (0)10 850 1200
> > F +31 (0)10 850 1199
> >
> > mailto:[email protected]
> > http://www.daidalos.nl/
> >
> > KvK 27164984
> >
> > P Please consider the environment before printing this mail.
> > De informatie - verzonden in of met dit e-mailbericht - is 
> afkomstig van Daidalos BV en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de 
> geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onbedoeld hebt ontvangen, 
> verzoeken wij u het te verwijderen. Aan dit bericht kunnen 
> geen rechten worden ontleend.
> >
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee, 
> >> David
> >> Sent: dinsdag 27 april 2010 15:27
> >> To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
> >> Subject: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] MarkLogic and MS Access 
> >> databasecommunication
> >>
> >> That seems like you'd need an ODBC to MarkLogic adaptor.
> >> I don't have an answer for that, sorry.
> >> Maybe one exists, but my suspicion (and quick googling) suggest it 
> >> doesn't.
> >>
> >> Can your Access apps be converted to use .NET or COM to 
> access the DB 
> >> ?
> >> It might be easier to write a .NET or COM adaptor specific to 
> >> application needs then ODBC.
> >> MarkLogic supports direct connections with .NET, or you 
> could write a 
> >> DCOM service.
> >> I think writing an ODBC connector would be very difficult.
> >>
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------
> >> David A. Lee
> >> Senior Principal Software Engineer
> >> Epocrates, Inc.
> >> [email protected]
> >> 812-482-5224
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
> Of Jakob 
> >> Fix
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:04 AM
> >> To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
> >> Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] MarkLogic and MS Access 
> >> databasecommunication
> >>
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> thanks for your answer and sorry for not being more precise.
> >> Our problem is that our Access databases connect to our 
> "master" SQL 
> >> Server database via ODBC for read-only access.
> >> Once our "master"
> >> database migrated to MarkLogic, how can we connect the Access 
> >> databases to the MarkLogic database, again for read-only access of 
> >> the data?
> >>
> >> So, to answer your question, your first scenario 
> corresponds to our 
> >> problem.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> Jakob.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 14:40, Lee, David 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Could you describe the issue in more detail ?
> >> > What I'm confused about is this
> >> >
> >> > "The SQL database of today has a large number of Access 
> databases 
> >> > accessing it via ODBC to retrieve"
> >> >
> >> > So are you saying you have *code* in an Access Database
> >> (client) that
> >> > currently accesses your SQLServer (DB / server) and you want that
> >> > *code* (in access) to start  accessing the data in 
> MarkLogic from 
> >> > within Access ?
> >> >
> >> > Or do you want code in MarkLogic to access data from an Access 
> >> > database ?
> >> >
> >> > -David
> >> >
> >> > ----------------------------------------
> >> > David A. Lee
> >> > Senior Principal Software Engineer
> >> > Epocrates, Inc.
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > 812-482-5224
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: [email protected]
> >> > [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Jakob 
> >> > Fix
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:06 AM
> >> > To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
> >> > Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] MarkLogic and MS Access 
> >> > databasecommunication
> >> >
> >> > Hi everybody,
> >> >
> >> > how would one go about connecting an Access database to 
> a MarkLogic 
> >> > database for the purpose of retrieving information 
> (read-only, no 
> >> > insertion nor updates)? Is this feasible, a crazy idea, 
> or actually 
> >> > trivial?
> >> >
> >> > The background behind this question is this: We 
> currently plan the 
> >> > move of an MS SQL Server database to MarkLogic. (Of course,
> >> this means
> >> > that the data model will change considerably, from
> >> row-based data to a
> >> > hierarchical structure.) The SQL database of today has a
> >> large number
> >> > of Access databases accessing it via ODBC to retrieve data for 
> >> > specialized purposes. We need to continue to provide 
> some kind of 
> >> > access to these MS Access databases.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance for your help!
> >> >
> >> > cheers,
> >> > Jakob.
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > General mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > General mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> General mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> General mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> _______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to