Hey Shannon, Would the <additional-query> option meet your need here? Effectively, it gets AND-ed with the rest of the query. Or if you are looking to constrain only bare terms, you might override the term function with <term apply="myfunction">...
-m On Jun 23, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Shannon wrote: > Hello, > > Using Search API, I need search:search, when no operator is specified, to be > constrained by a word-query of field -- Can a default constraint be > configured in an options node, or should I omit the field approach and use > unions in the searchable expression instead? My aim is to define many > includes and excludes, and a field would be more elegant -- Maybe a > default-query-source, similar to default-suggestion-source, would be a useful > option? > > Thanks in advance. > > Best, > Shannon > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
