Great, thanks! In the meantime I'll explore the other possibilities you and Micah shared. Have a good weekend!
Sent from my iPhone On Jun 23, 2010, at 19:12, Colleen Whitney <[email protected]> wrote: > Shannon, > > That sounds useful to me too, I'll put in an RFE. :-) > > Would a Word Query configuration on the database be feasible for your use > case? > > --Colleen > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shannon > [[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:31 PM > To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion > Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Search API: supply a default search:search > constraint? > > Hello, > > Using Search API, I need search:search, when no operator is specified, to be > constrained by a word-query of field -- Can a default constraint be > configured in an options node, or should I omit the field approach and use > unions in the searchable expression instead? My aim is to define many > includes and excludes, and a field would be more elegant -- Maybe a > default-query-source, similar to default-suggestion-source, would be a useful > option? > > Thanks in advance. > > Best, > Shannon > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
