Thank you for confirmation, David. I have not tried 6 yet, will try.

John

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:49 PM, David Lee <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is not right. [M003] should produce 012
>
> format-dateTime has been rewritten in 6.0 to solve these kinds of issues.
> Have you tried 6.0 ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPad (excuse the terseness)
> David A Lee
> [email protected]
>
>
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:32 PM, "John Zhong" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found a interesting thing about fn:format-dateTime function, see below
> code:
> >
> > xquery version "1.0-ml";
> >
> > fn:format-dateTime(fn:current-dateTime(),
> >                  "[MN,*-3] [D01], [Y0001] at [H01]:[m01]:[s01]"),
> > fn:format-dateTime(fn:current-dateTime(),
> >                  "[M001] [D01], [Y0001] at [H01]:[m01]:[s01]"),
> > fn:format-dateTime(fn:current-dateTime(),
> >                  "[M01] [D01], [Y0001] at [H01]:[m01]:[s01]")
> >
> > returns:
> >
> > DEC 05, 2012 at 13:21:02
> > Dec 05, 2012 at 13:21:02
> > 12 05, 2012 at 13:21:02
> >
> > For 2nd one, if I use Saxon9 to execute it from a xslt template, the
> [M001] returns 012 in this case. But ML (I am using 5.0-4) return Dec, is
> it expected?
> >
> > John
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to