If searches normally arrive via http, you could use any HTTP test client: http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/httperf/ for example. If you normally send queries via XCC, you might look at https://github.com/marklogic/performance-meters
Think about factors that might influence performance. For example what queries to test, and how many clients to use. Or caching: when all data is in cache, there shouldn't be any difference between the two configurations. What are you expecting to see? My general experience is that multiple forests have more impact on ingestion speed than query speed. -- Mike On 21 Aug 2013, at 08:37 , Christine Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I recently created a new version for the database of our largest digital > library collection with two forests, rather than one. > > Now, I'd like to compare the speed of these two databases--the old one with > one forest and the new one with two. I want to test search query speed. > > What's the best approach to this kind of testing? Is it possible to do this > without bothering our developer to amend his code with query trace, etc.? > > Thanks, > > Chris > > Christine Schwartz > XML Database Administrator > Princeton Theological Seminary Library > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
