Hi,
Here is the statement.
cts:search(/document:document,
cts:boost-query(
cts:or-query(
cts:element-value-query(fn:QName("ns","collection"), "publisher",
("exact","lang=en"), 1)),
cts:or-query((
cts:element-value-query(fn:QName("ns","publishercode"), "ON",
("exact","lang=en"), 16),
cts:element-value-query(fn:QName("ns","publishercode"), "ISO",
("exact","lang=en"), 13),
cts:element-value-query(fn:QName("ns","publishercode"), "BEUTH",
("exact","lang=en"), 10),
cts:element-value-query(fn:QName("ns","statuscode"), "N",
("exact","lang=en"), 8),
cts:element-value-query(fn:QName("ns","statuscode"), "VN",
("exact","lang=en"), 7),
cts:element-value-query(fn:QName("ns","statuscode"), "N-E",
("exact","lang=en"), 6),
cts:element-value-query(fn:QName("ns","statuscode"), "TR",
("exact","lang=en"), 4),
cts:element-value-query(fn:QName("ns","collection"), "corporate",
("exact","lang=en"), -16),
cts:element-range-query(fn:QName("ns","docdatetime"), ">=",
xs:date("1980-01-01"), ("score-function=linear","slope-factor=0.0625"),
0.25)), ())
),
(cts:score-order("descending"), "faceted"))[1 to 10]
For my question the element-value-queries on the statuscode, the collection
and the docdatetime should not matter.
In a unit test database I have three documents that are equivalent except
for a numeric id and the *publishercode* (ON, ISO and BEUTH). Due to the
boosting I would expect the document with the publishercode ON to be the
first result, the document with ISO the second result and the document with
BEUTH the last result.
But the order is ISO, ON, BEUTH.
When I rename ON to ONT in both the query and the test document then order
of the query result is as expected: ONT, ISO, BEUTH.
Thus it seems that the word ON is ranked somehow lower, overriding the
weights.
Cheers,
Andreas
2015-06-09 13:02 GMT+02:00 Geert Josten <[email protected]>:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Can you share the entire cts:search statement?
>
> Cheers,
> Geert
>
> From: Andreas Hubmer <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 12:58 PM
> To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <[email protected]>
> Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Boosting with simple scoring
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using cts:search with the option "score-logtfidf" and a
> cts:boost-query for my search. I am boosting on some meta-elements that are
> enumerations where the meaning does not matter. But what one value is "on"
> and due to logtfidf scoring (I guess) the boost on that value does not
> matter much.
>
> logtfidf is perfect for my word queries, but not for the
> element-value-queries that I use in the boosting query. Is it possible to
> use "score-simple" for the boosting query only and "score-logtfidf" for the
> "real" query?
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas
>
>
> --
> Andreas Hubmer
> IT Consultant
>
> EBCONT enterprise technologies GmbH
> Millennium Tower
> Handelskai 94-96
> A-1200 Vienna
>
> OUR TEAM IS YOUR SUCCESS
>
> UID-Nr. ATU68135644
> HG St.Pölten - FN 399978 d
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> Manage your subscription at:
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
--
Andreas Hubmer
IT Consultant
EBCONT enterprise technologies GmbH
Millennium Tower
Handelskai 94-96
A-1200 Vienna
Mobile: +43 664 60651861
Fax: +43 2772 512 69-9
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.ebcont.com
OUR TEAM IS YOUR SUCCESS
UID-Nr. ATU68135644
HG St.Pölten - FN 399978 d
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
Manage your subscription at:
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
