What makes the logtfidf score inappropriate for metadata? It occurs to me that if you put the metadata in every doc one time (though not in the metadata section if it is not really “there” for the doc) you’ll fool the system into thinking that all metadata has the same tf and idf, so more like score-simple. It’s a hack and I’m not quite sure it will work, so please share the underlying result ordering problem so we know what to work around.
Damon From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Hubmer Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:59 AM To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Boosting with simple scoring Hi, I am using cts:search with the option "score-logtfidf" and a cts:boost-query for my search. I am boosting on some meta-elements that are enumerations where the meaning does not matter. But what one value is "on" and due to logtfidf scoring (I guess) the boost on that value does not matter much. logtfidf is perfect for my word queries, but not for the element-value-queries that I use in the boosting query. Is it possible to use "score-simple" for the boosting query only and "score-logtfidf" for the "real" query? Best regards, Andreas -- Andreas Hubmer IT Consultant EBCONT enterprise technologies GmbH Millennium Tower Handelskai 94-96 A-1200 Vienna OUR TEAM IS YOUR SUCCESS UID-Nr. ATU68135644 HG St.Pölten - FN 399978 d
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] Manage your subscription at: http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
