On Jul 3, 2016, at 10:55 PM, Hans Hübner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Jason Hunter <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > After reading Justin's follow up, I think you'll agree there's no need to > update the IMLS section? > > Yes. The discussion lead us to a much better understanding and we're going > to reengineer the part of our application that relies on database timestamps > for history visualization so that it uses application timestamps instead. > The use of database timestamps has the disadvantage that adding data to the > historic pictures is not possible in a consistent fashion, which we sometimes > need to respond to input data or software errors. > > Thanks for helping! > -Hans
Exactly. You may want to consider the temporal functions. They're useful if you want to track the historic picture as well as how the picture changed over time. So when you do the correction you'll have a record of it being a correction made at a certain time. There's some coverage in IMLS. ;) -jh-
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] Manage your subscription at: http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
