Yes, that makes sense. I was referring to the Qt8 demos only. Jhs is a different animal obviously. Perhaps the two categories of demos could use the same interface. The "View Source" button would be nice on the wd demo form.
As to the demos in Jhs. Why not give the demos names instead of numbers. That way one could choose what he wants to see. On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:11 AM, chris burke <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, though I think it still makes sense to have two separate demos. > Perhaps the "wd" menu should be renamed, e.g. > > Qt - examples of Qt controls, useful for the developer > Showcase - examples of using J > > Some of the "wd" demos that are specifically related to controls or events > should be removed or moved to Qt. > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Don Guinn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Help/Studio brings up Qt Demos and WD Demos. Yet both use wd. Separate > sets > > of demos implies that the Qt and wd interfaces are different. Early in > the > > development of the Qt interface it made sense to develop the demos using > > the Qt interface separate from the older demos. But why not combine them > > now? > > > > Combining them would require a little cleanup as there are duplicate > names > > like "controls" in both sets. And the Qt demos tend to show specific > > examples of forms tools where wd demos tend to more demo applications. > > Maybe grouping types of demos like labs are grouped into categories would > > make sense as the list of demos is quite long. But they are not > different. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
