Is %. affected by migration to SLEEF? On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, 9:32 AM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
> The %. implementation may change from time to time, but I don't think it > did in this case. > > The implementation of ^. did, and might account for the difference. You > could check. > > Henry Rich > > On 1/13/2021 7:56 PM, Vanessa McHale wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I perform the calculation > > > > 2 4 6 %. 1 2 3 ^/ i.2 > > > > for the test suite of my j package > > https://github.com/vmchale/j-hs/blob/main/test/Spec.hs#L76 > > > > With J 9.01 this gave (5.995204332975845e-15, 1.9999999999999971) as a > > result. With J902, it gives (7.105427357601002e-15, 1.9999999999999967). > > > > Since the exact answer is (0, 2), this is ever-so-slightly more > > incorrect! Any insights into why? > > > > (I'm on x86_64 and Linux FWIW) > > > > Cheers, > > Vanessa McHale > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
